Saturday 27 October 2012

Reply from a Taxation Advisor with the Company Pelican Consulting


Dear Mrs. Johnston,
 Further to our discussion this morning, some comments for you.
With all best regards,
Dr. Michael Annett     [ mpfa@pelican-consulting.fr ]

Social charges on pensions
Firstly, there is absolutely no relation whatsoever 
between the healthcare system (e.g.. CPAM) and the social 
charges on pension income.
There is an exemption from some of the social charges on
 pension income if not a liability to the French social security
 system as a whole.  As far as healthcare was concerned, the only 
way in which to show non-liability to the system was to show the
 E121, now the S1, since this confirmed that all healthcare costs
 were paid by the person's host country social services.
Accordingly, the relation is between the E121/S1 and some of the
Social charges.
The general exemption from social charges on pension income
 stems ONLY from having an EU State Old Age pension, since social
 charges cannot be applied to income which is being paid due to
 social charges themselves having formerly been paid.  This exemption
 has been extended by the EU to all pension income in the case of 
British nationals resident in France.
The Franco British double tax treaty
This has been the cause of many issues, mainly due to tax 
offices applying the Treaty's provisions a year earlier than
 they should have.
Essentially, as far as International Treaties are concerned,
 there is a master international treaty that states that, unless
 otherwise indicated in a particular Treaty, the effective date of 
entry into force of a Treaty is the last date on which the countries
 party to that Treaty legally ratified it.
The Franco-British Treaty, pursuant to this start date system, 
can be seen to therefore become applicable from the 1st
 January 2010.
However, article 31 of the new Franco-British double tax
 treaty clearly states that the Treaty will become effective only
 once both countries have terminated their relevant legal 
procedures for bringing the Treaty into effect.  Then the the 
same article confirms the applicable date of the Treaty for France 
being the start of the following tax year.  French civil
law states that no law can be effective until it is 
published in the 'Journal Officiel', which, in the case of the
 Treaty was not effected until January 2010.  This being later 
than the UK's date of completion of its legal requirements means
 that the applicable date of the provisions of the Treaty is the 
start of the following tax year - 1st January 2011.
Changes in the new Franco-British double tax treaty
The Treaty did not change the manner in which income was
 generally assessed, but it did change the manner in which 
the French assimilated the effect of the foreign-assessed income,
 the new system resulting in a tax credit being given on 
this income.

Essentially, the new system is that world income is assessed
, and French tax calculated in the normal manner.  This total
 tax is then expressed as a percentage of the assessable income.
  Then, this tax percentage is applied to the foreign-assessed 
income in order to provide the tax credit to which the taxpayer
 is due.
Changes in the manner in which foreign-assessed income is
 Declared Foreign-assessed income, such as government income and
 foreign rentals, are declared in section VI of the pink 2047 form,
 and then transferred to box 8TK on the main blue 2042 form.
Issues with the tax office on pension, government and foreign
 rental income
The first point to bear in mind is that, just as with every
 country, the French tax forms are intended for French nationals
 declaring their income.These forms are not specifically designed
 for foreigners or income that falls under the provisions of a double
 tax treaty. Therefore, whilst a French national would declare
 income in section VI of the pink 2047 form, this is then, yes,
 liable to the social charges.
However, a foreign national declaring, for example,
 UK rental income, in the same section of the form, would not be
 liable to the social charges.
So there is a conflict in the manner in which income
 is to be treated.
Sadly, the provisions of the double tax treaty came into
 effect before the tax authorities changed their computer systems,
 causing many incorrect assessments.
However, article 6 of the Treaty which covers foreign
 rental income does still quite clearly state that this income
 is assessable in the UK.  Full stop.  Accordingly, it is not
 assessable and cannot be assessed in France.
As a result, is not and cannot be made liable to the
 social charges.
Furthermore, and as a safety clause, article 24 which deals
 with the double tax provisions, states equally clearly that
 in order to compute French taxation the foreign income will
 be taken into account - but note that the expression is
 'taken into account', and not 'assessed'.  The article then
goes on to state that it is not the UK tax paid that is
 taken into account by the French, but French tax computed in
 the French manner ... and hence the tax credit as
 mentioned above. Incidentally, the French tax credit applies 
whether or not UK tax has been paid.
So, clearly, not only is their no right to assess foreign rental
 income in France, this is confirmed by the manner in which
 the French account for this income as part of the
 taxpayer's world income.
Now, one reason for which the tax office may apply the
 social charges can be pursuant to their view of mitigating
 tax evasion and in order to raise an objection from the taxpayer
 as to the assessment dues ... so as to then be able to ask for
 Proof that the rental income has been declared to the UK tax
authorities (since too many people don't, in the belief that
 this is not necessary).
Contentions with the tax office
One word of warning, as the procedure for complaints and 
Rectifying incorrect assessments is fairly defined, you should
 use a professional as frequently taxpayers initially try themselves
 before seeking profession help, only by then things are
 frequently too advanced for the tax authorities to accept
 possibly being in the wrong, to then only confirm prior 
decisions, and the whole process is then geared to only 
being solved in court.
Finally, unfortunately this year there have been many errors with 
the tax assessments.
   Dr. Michael Annett    
Diverses qualifications professionnelles britanniques
 en
 Comptabilité, Fiscalité, Droit, Finance et Gestion de 
Patrimoine Université Aix-Marseille Diplôme Universitaire
 en Gestion de Patrimoine, Master I, Master II et Maitrise 
en Droit, Fiscalité,  Gestion, Finance et  Gestion de Patrimoine  
PELICAN consulting www.pelican-consulting.fr
Consultants in wealth management, financial investments,
 banking operations, finance and mortgages, 
independant insurance brokers and international taxation.

Val says Michael Annett is available to take on your cases 
against the tax authorities  
and he can be contacted at mpfa@pelican-consulting.fr